Retracted and republished from: "The current state of research on influenza antiviral drug development: drugs in clinical trial and licensed drugs".

Influenza viruses (IVs) threaten global human health due to the high morbidity, infection, and mortality rates. Currently, the influenza drugs recommended by the Food and Drug Administration are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and baloxavir marboxil. These recommended antivirals are currently effective for major subtypes of IVs as the compounds target conserved domains in neuraminidase or polymerase acidic (PA) protein. However, this trend may gradually change due to the selection of antiviral drugs and the natural evolution of IVs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop drugs related to the treatment of influenza to deal with the next pandemic. Here, we summarized the cutting-edge research in mechanism of action, inhibitory activity, and clinical efficacy of drugs that have been approved and drugs that are still in clinical trials for influenza treatment. We hope this review will provide up-to-date and comprehensive information on influenza antivirals and generate hypotheses for screens and development of new broad-spectrum influenza drugs in the near future.

Structural Studies of Inhibitors with Clinically Relevant Influenza Endonuclease Variants.

Vital to the treatment of influenza is the use of antivirals such as Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and Zanamivir (Relenza); however, antiviral resistance is becoming an increasing problem for these therapeutics. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase acidic N-terminal (PAN) endonuclease, a critical component of influenza viral replication machinery, is an antiviral target that was recently validated with the approval of Baloxavir Marboxil (BXM). Despite its clinical success, BXM has demonstrated susceptibility to resistance mutations, specifically the I38T, E23K, and A36 V mutants of PAN. To better understand the effects of these mutations on BXM resistance and improve the design of more robust therapeutics, this study examines key differences in protein-inhibitor interactions with two inhibitors and the I38T, E23K, and A36 V mutants. Differences in inhibitor binding were evaluated by measuring changes in binding to PAN using two biophysical methods. The binding mode of two distinct inhibitors was determined crystallographically with both wild-type and mutant forms of PAN. Collectively, these studies give some insight into the mechanism of antiviral resistance of these mutants.

In vitro neuraminidase inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of four neuraminidase inhibitors in the Japanese 2022-23 season: Comparison with the 2010-11 to 2019-20 seasons.

To assess the extent of susceptibility to the four neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) approved in Japan of the epidemic viruses in the 2022-23 influenza season in Japan, we measured the 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) of oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir in influenza virus isolates from patients. Viral isolation was done with specimens obtained prior to and after treatment, and the type/subtype was determined by RT-PCR using type- and subtype-specific primers. The IC50 was determined by a neuraminidase inhibition assay using a fluorescent substrate. Virus isolates, one A(H1N1)pdm09 and 74 A(H3N2), were measured in the 2022-23 season. The geometric mean IC50s of the 74 A(H3N2) isolated prior to treatment were 0.78 nM, 0.66 nM, 2.08 nM, and 2.85 nM for oseltamivir, peramivir, zanamivir, and laninamivir, respectively, comparable to those of the previous ten studied seasons. No A(H3N2) with highly reduced sensitivity to any of the NAIs was found in the 2022-23 season prior to or after drug administration. These results indicate that the sensitivity to these four commonly used NAIs has been maintained, at least for A(H3N2), in the 2022-23 influenza season in Japan, after the 2020-21 and 2021-22 seasons when the prevalence of influenza was extremely low.

The current state of research on influenza antiviral drug development: drugs in clinical trial and licensed drugs.

Influenza viruses (IVs) threaten global human health due to the high morbidity, infection, and mortality rates. Currently, the influenza drugs recommended by the FDA are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and baloxavir marboxil. Notably, owing to the high variability of IVs, no drug exists that can effectively treat all types and subtypes of IVs. Moreover, the current trend of drug resistance is likely to continue as the viral genome is constantly mutating. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop drugs related to the treatment of influenza to deal with the next pandemic. Here, we summarized the cutting-edge research in mechanism of action, inhibitory activity, and clinical efficacy of drugs that have been approved and drugs that are still in clinical trials for influenza treatment. We hope this review will provide up-to-date and comprehensive information on influenza antivirals and generate hypotheses for screens and development of new broad-spectrum influenza drugs in the near future.

An armed anti-immunoglobulin light chain nanobody protects mice against influenza A and B infections.

The immune system eliminates pathogen intruders such as viruses and bacteria. To recruit immune effectors to virus-infected cells, we conjugated a small molecule, the influenza neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir, to a nanobody that recognizes the kappa light chains of mouse immunoglobulins. This adduct was designed to achieve half-life extension of zanamivir through complex formation with the much-larger immunoglobulins in the circulation. The zanamivir moiety targets the adduct to virus-infected cells, whereas the anti-kappa component simultaneously delivers polyclonal immunoglobulins of indeterminate specificity and all isotypes. Activation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity promoted elimination of influenza neuraminidase-positive cells. A single dose of the conjugate protected mice against influenza A or B viruses and was effective even when given several days after infection with a lethal dose of virus. In the absence of circulating immunoglobulins, we observed no in vivo protection from the adduct. The type of conjugates described here may thus find application for both anti-influenza prophylaxis and therapy.

A five-day treatment course of zanamivir for the flu with a single, self-administered, painless microneedle array patch: Revolutionizing delivery of poorly membrane-permeable therapeutics.

Seasonal influenza virus infections cause a substantial number of deaths each year. While zanamivir (ZAN) is efficacious against oseltamivir-resistant influenza strains, the efficacy of the drug is limited by its route of administration, oral inhalation. Herein, we present the development of a hydrogel-forming microneedle array (MA) in combination with ZAN reservoirs for treating seasonal influenza. The MA was fabricated from Gantrez® S-97 crosslinked with PEG 10,000. Various reservoir formulations included ZAN hydrate, ZAN hydrochloric acid (HCl), CarraDres™, gelatin, trehalose, and/or alginate. In vitro permeation studies with a lyophilized reservoir consisting of ZAN HCl, gelatin, and trehalose resulted in rapid and high delivery of up to 33 mg of ZAN across the skin with delivery efficiency of up to ≈75% by 24 h. Pharmacokinetics studies in rats and pigs demonstrated that a single administration of a MA in combination with a CarraDres™ ZAN HCl reservoir offered a simple and minimally invasive delivery of ZAN into the systemic circulation. In pigs, efficacious plasma and lung steady-state levels of ∼120 ng/mL were reached within 2 h and sustained between 50 and 250 ng/mL over 5 days. MA-enabled delivery of ZAN could enable a larger number of patients to be reached during an influenza outbreak.

Factors associated with viral RNA shedding and evaluation of potential viral infectivity at returning to school in influenza outpatients after treatment with baloxavir marboxil and neuraminidase inhibitors during 2013/2014-2019/2020 seasons in Japan: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the differences in daily virus reduction and the residual infectivity after the recommended home stay period in Japan in patients infected with influenza and treated with baloxavir (BA), laninamivir (LA), oseltamivir (OS), and zanamivir (ZA). METHODS: We conducted an observational study on children and adults at 13 outpatient clinics in 11 prefectures in Japan during seven influenza seasons from 2013/2014 to 2019/2020. Virus samples were collected twice from influenza rapid test-positive patients at the first and second visit 4-5 days after the start of treatment. The viral RNA shedding was quantified using quantitative RT-PCR. Neuraminidase (NA) and polymerase acidic (PA) variant viruses that reduce susceptibility to NA inhibitors and BA, respectively, were screened using RT-PCR and genetic sequencing. Daily estimated viral reduction was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses for the factors such as age, treatment, vaccination status, or the emergence of PA or NA variants. The potential infectivity of the viral RNA shedding at the second visit samples was determined using the Receiver Operator Curve based on the positivity of virus isolation. RESULTS: Among 518 patients, 465 (80.0%) and 116 (20.0%) were infected with influenza A (189 with BA, 58 with LA, 181 with OS, 37 with ZA) and influenza B (39 with BA, 10 with LA, 52 with OS, 15 with ZA). The emergence of 21 PA variants in influenza A was detected after BA treatment, but NA variants were not detected after NAIs treatment. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the daily viral RNA shedding reduction in patients was slower in the two NAIs (OS and LA) than in BA, influenza B infection, aged 0-5 years, or the emergence of PA variants. The residual viral RNA shedding potentially infectious was detected in approximately 10-30% of the patients aged 6-18 years after five days of onset. CONCLUSIONS: Viral clearance differed by age, type of influenza, choice of treatment, and susceptibility to BA. Additionally, the recommended homestay period in Japan seemed insufficient, but reduced viral spread to some extent since most school-age patients became non-infectious after 5 days of onset.

Epidemiological survey on the benefit of neuraminidase inhibitors on severe acute respiratory syndrome due to COVID-19 / Levantamento epidemiológico do benefício de inibidores de neuraminidase na síndrome respiratória aguda grave por COVID-19 / Encuesta epidemiológica del beneficio de inhibidores de neuraminidase en síndrome respiratorio agudo severo por COVID-19

Background and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic and its consequent severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have taken the lives of millions since 2020. The use of neuraminidase inhibitors is a promising alternative in treating this disease, with several studies on off-label use being conducted since the beginning of the pandemic, but none of them have a large sample size and analyze multiple risk factors. The purpose of this article is to identify possible associations between various factors and risk of hospitalization, need for ventilation and death, as well as the influence of the prescription of Zanamivir and Oseltamivir on these same indicators. Methods: In this transversal study, approximately 900,000 medical records from all regions of Brazil were collected from the Ministry of Health database, and after that, proper statistical analysis of the variables was performed. Results: Hospitalization was associated with gender, ethnicity, education, local urbanization, State, and its percentage of elderly, as well as the climate. The prescription of Zanamivir and Oseltamivir was associated with higher incidence of symptoms, lower hospitalization and death rate, and lower need for invasive and non-invasive ventilation. Medical records from146,160 patients were excluded due to SARS not caused by COVID-19. Conclusion: From this data, it is possible to draw a risk profile for hospitalization by SARS and consider the use of Zanamivir and Oseltamivir as a treatment for these patients.(AU)

Justificativa e objetivos: A pandemia de COVID-19 e sua consequente síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SRAG) levaram milhões de pessoas a óbito desde 2020. O uso de inibidores da neuraminidase é uma alternativa promissora no tratamento dessa doença, com vários estudos sobre o uso off-label sendo conduzidos desde o início da pandemia, mas nenhum que tenha um grande tamanho amostral e que analise vários fatores de risco. O objetivo deste artigo é identificar possíveis associações entre diversos fatores e risco de hospitalização, necessidade de ventilação e óbito, assim como a influência da prescrição de Zanamivir e Oseltamivir nos mesmos indicadores. Métodos: Neste estudo transversal, foi feito o levantamento de aproximadamente 900 mil prontuários de todas as regiões do Brasil, provenientes de dados do Ministério da Saúde, e em seguida foi realizado o tratamento estatístico adequado das variáveis. Resultados: A hospitalização foi associada a sexo, etnia, escolaridade, urbanização do local, Estado e porcentagem de idosos do mesmo, assim como o clima. Já a prescrição de Zanamivir e Oseltamivir foi associada a maior incidência de sintomas, menor taxa de hospitalização e óbito e menor necessidade de ventilação invasiva e não-invasiva. Foram excluídos 146.160 prontuários devido a SRAG não ocasionada pela COVID-19. Conclusão: Com esses dados, é possível traçar um perfil de risco para hospitalização por SRAG e considerar o uso de Zanamivir e Oseltamivir como tratamento para esses pacientes.(AU)

Justificación y objetivos: la pandemia Covid-19 y su consiguiente síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SRAS) han muerto millones de personas desde 2020. El uso de inhibidores de la neuraminidasa es una alternativa prometedora en el tratamiento de esta enfermedad, con varios estudios sobre el uso off-label que se realiza desde el principio de la pandemia, pero ninguno que tenga un tamaño de muestra grande y analice múltiples factores de riesgo. El propósito de este artículo es identificar posibles asociaciones entre varios factores y el riesgo de hospitalización, necesidad de ventilación y muerte, así como la influencia de la prescripción de Zanamivir y Oseltamivir en los mismos indicadores. Métodos: En este estudio transversal, se encuestaron a los datos del Ministerio de Salud de aproximadamente 900,000 registros de todas las regiones de Brasil, después de que se realizó un tratamiento estadístico adecuado de las variables. Resultados: La hospitalización se asoció con género, etnia, educación, urbanización del sitio, Estado y porcentaje de ancianos, así como el clima. La prescripción de zanamivir y oseltamivir se asoció con la mayor incidencia de síntomas, menor hospitalización y tasa de mortalidad y menor necesidad de ventilación invasiva y no invasiva. Se excluyeron 146,160 registros médicos debido a SRAS no causado por Covid-19. Conclusión: con estos datos, es posible dibujar un perfil de riesgo para la hospitalización por SRAS y considerar el uso de zanamivir y oseltamivir como tratamiento para estos pacientes.(AU)

Antiviral therapies for influenza.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The heavily suppressed global influenza activity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is expected to return upon relaxation of travel restriction and nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPI). We reviewed the four marketed neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI e.g., oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, laninamivir) and the only endonuclease inhibitor (baloxavir) on their clinical therapeutic effects and the ability of viral suppression in various groups of patients of different clinical settings based on the latest evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Early initiation, preferably within 48 h of symptom onsets, of antiviral treatments with NAI and baloxavir, is crucial to produce favourable outcomes in patients with influenza infection. Updated evidence does not suggest routine use of combined antiviral agents in patients with influenza infection. Treatment-emergent resistant influenza variants may occur during NAI and baloxavir use, but it has no major impact on subsequent recovery. Early treatment of index patients with influenza infection and post-exposure prophylaxis in specific populations is crucial in preventing influenza transmission. SUMMARY: Antiviral therapy is the major defence therapeutically in the community and hospital settings to expedite early recovery and reduce influenza-related complications. Early treatment of index patients and post-exposure prophylaxis in susceptible close contacts may mitigate the spread of infection.

Lessons from resistance analysis in clinical trials of IV zanamivir.

Influenza infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality during seasonal epidemics and pandemics. Antivirals, including neuraminidase inhibitors, play an important role in the treatment of severely ill patients infected with influenza. Resistance is a key factor that can affect the efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs). It is a recommendation by regulatory authorities to monitor for resistance during the development of anti-influenza medications. An additional requirement by regulators is to examine amino acid sequences for minority species harbouring resistance substitutions. In a Phase III study of intravenous (IV) zanamivir respiratory samples were analysed for the presence of resistant quasi species using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). In this study ten resistance substitutions, two of which were treatment emergent, were detected by NGS that otherwise would not have been detectable by Sanger sequencing. None of the substitutions were present at any other timepoints analysed. The effect these mutations have on clinical response is difficult to characterize; in fact, all patients from which these variants were isolated had a successful clinical outcome and the effect on clinical response was therefore likely minimal. Although NGS is becoming a routine method for nucleic acid sequencing and will detect substitutions previously undetected by Sanger sequencing, the value of this technique in identifying minority species with resistance substitutions that are clinically meaningful remains to be demonstrated, particularly with acute infections such as influenza.

Pharmacokinetics of zanamivir in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist for dosing of zanamivir in the setting of CVVH in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our objective is to report the pharmacokinetics and sieving coefficient (Sv) of zanamivir in patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients of ≥18 years admitted to the ICU with a life-threatening Influenza A or B infection, treated with zanamivir i.v. undergoing CVVH were included. Patients received a zanamivir loading dose of 600 mg i.v., 12 h later followed by maintenance dosages two times daily according to the treating physician. Per patient, nine CFT plasma and nine ultrafiltrate samples were drawn on day 2 of treatment and analysed with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: Four patients were included in the study. The zanamivir elimination half-life was prolonged with 5.6-9.9 h, compared to patients with normal renal function. A Sv of approximately 1.0 was identified, with unrestricted transport of zanamivir to the ultrafiltrate. CONCLUSIONS: Zanamivir is well cleared by CVVH. In absence of the possibility for therapeutic drug monitoring, the ultrafiltration rate seems as a good surrogate parameter to estimate the CLCVVH and may help guide the dosing of zanamivir.

Effect of neuraminidase inhibitor (oseltamivir) treatment on outcome of hospitalised influenza patients, surveillance data from 11 EU countries, 2010 to 2020.

BackgroundTimely treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI) can reduce severe outcomes in influenza patients.AimWe assessed the impact of antiviral treatment on in-hospital deaths of laboratory-confirmed influenza patients in 11 European Union countries from 2010/11 to 2019/20.MethodsCase-based surveillance data from hospitalised patients with known age, sex, outcome, ward, vaccination status, timing of antiviral treatment, and hospitalisation were obtained. A mixed effect logistic regression model using country as random intercept was applied to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for in-hospital death in patients treated with NAIs vs not treated.ResultsOf 19,937 patients, 31% received NAIs within 48 hours of hospital admission. Older age (60-79 years aOR 3.0, 95% CI: 2.4-3.8; 80 years 8.3 (6.6-10.5)) and intensive care unit admission (3.8, 95% CI: 3.4-4.2) increased risk of dying, while early hospital admission after symptom onset decreased risk (aOR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.90-0.93). NAI treatment initiation within 48 hours and up to 7 days reduced risk of dying (0-48 hours aOR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.45-0.59; 3-4 days 0.59 (0.51-0.67); 5-7 days 0.64 (0.56-0.74)), in particular in patients 40 years and older (e.g. treatment within 48 hours: 40-59 years aOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.66; 60-79 years 0.50 (0.39-0.63); ≥80 years 0.51 (0.42-0.63)).ConclusionNAI treatment given within 48 hours and possibly up to 7 days after symptom onset reduced risk of in-hospital death. NAI treatment should be considered in older patients to prevent severe outcomes.

Duration of fever and other symptoms after the inhalation of laninamivir octanoate hydrate: A study of the 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons and comparison with the 2011/12 to 2016/17 Japanese influenza seasons.

INTRODUCTION: Large scale investigation of the clinical effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors for circulating influenza viruses are important along with the surveillance of virus susceptibility in vitro. METHODS: The duration of fever and other influenza symptoms as markers of the clinical effectiveness of laninamivir octanoate hydrate (laninamivir) were investigated in the Japanese 2017/18 and 2018/19 influenza seasons and compared with the results of the previous six seasons. RESULTS: Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B were found in 14, 45, and 52 patients in the 2017/18 season and in 22, 62, and 0 in the 2018/19 season, respectively. The median duration of fever for B was significantly longer than for A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) in the 2017/18 season (p = 0.0461) and for A(H3N2) than for A(H1N1)pdm09 in the 2018/19 season (p = 0.0290). However, the differences were subtle in both seasons for other symptoms, with no significant differences in their median duration in comparison of the circulating types/subtypes. Over the eight seasons with the previous six seasons added, the median durations of fever were consistently longer for B than for A, but the relation between the A subtypes was inconsistent. The median durations of fever were comparable over the eight seasons for the virus types/subtypes, as were the median durations of other symptoms. The percentage of febrile patients decreased in a similar pattern over the eight seasons for each type/subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that laninamivir has continued to be clinically effective against all types/subtypes of influenza viruses, with no safety issues.

Characterization of influenza B viruses with reduced susceptibility to influenza neuraminidase inhibitors.

A total of 3425 influenza B viruses collected from the Asia-Pacific region were tested against the four registered neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) (oseltamivir carboxylate, zanamivir, peramivir and laninamivir) as part of the routine surveillance work at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Reference on Influenza, Melbourne between 2016 and 2020. Forty-five influenza B viruses with reduced susceptibility to one or more NAIs were identified. While the majority of these had neuraminidase (NA) mutations that were known to confer NAIs resistance, fifteen had NA mutations that had not been confirmed as being responsible for reduced NAIs susceptibility. Eleven of these NA mutations of concern were investigated using reverse genetics (RG) techniques to verify that these mutations were the cause of the reduced NAI susceptibility. All mutations were introduced separately into the NA of B/Brisbane/27/2016 (a B Victoria-lineage virus) or B/Yamanashi/166/98 (a B Yamagata-lineage virus) and the effects of these were analysed by an in vitro NAI assay. The T146K substitution in the NA of B Victoria and Yamagata-lineages resulted in a large increase in the IC50 for peramivir (>1000-fold increase in the mean IC50 of sensitive viruses with T146) with smaller increases for zanamivir and oseltamivir. A proline substitution (T146P) had a slightly lower (>700-fold) effect on the peramivir IC50 and also on the other NAIs. The presence of a second NA mutation at N169S combined with the T146P further increased the IC50 of peramivir (>7000-fold) and the other NAIs. A synergistic effect was also confirmed for dual NA mutations with G247D + I361V which showed a modest increase in the IC50 for oseltamivir (6-fold). Only one of two RG-viruses with the mutation G108E could be rescued and it had a high IC50 against zanamivir (>4000-fold) and laninamivir (>7000-fold), but a lower IC50 against oseltamivir (>200-fold). NA mutations H101L, A200T, D432G, H439P and H439R were also confirmed to somewhat reduce the in vitro susceptibility of influenza B viruses to the NAIs. Overall, this study identifies the potential impact of selected mutations on the clinical performance of NAIs when used to treat influenza B infection in humans.

Antivirals Targeting the Neuraminidase.

The neuraminidase (NA) of influenza A and B viruses plays a distinct role in viral replication and has a highly conserved catalytic site. Numerous sialic (neuraminic) acid analogs that competitively bind to the NA active site and potently inhibit enzyme activity have been synthesized and tested. Four NA inhibitors are now licensed in various parts of the world (zanamivir, oseltamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir) to treat influenza A and B infections. NA changes, naturally occurring or acquired under selective pressure, have been shown to reduce drug binding, thereby affecting the effectiveness of NA inhibitors. Drug resistance and other drawbacks have prompted the search for the next-generation NA-targeting therapeutics. One of the promising approaches is the identification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the conserved NA epitopes. Anti-NA mAbs demonstrate Fab-based antiviral activity supplemented with Fc-mediated immune effector functions. Antiviral Fc-conjugates offer another cutting-edge strategy that is based on a multimodal mechanism of action. These novel antiviral agents are composed of a small-molecule NA inhibitor and an Fc-region that simultaneously engages the immune system. The significant advancements made in recent years further support the value of NA as an attractive target for the antiviral development.

Antiviral use in healthcare workers-A systematic review.

Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are likely part of the rapid response and control in influenza pandemics and institutional outbreaks. We conducted a systematic review to appraise the current evidence on the use of NAIs among healthcare workers in the context of an influenza pandemic.